Close Menu
  • Home
  • Life Insurance
  • Auto Insurance
  • Home Insurance
  • Health Insurance
  • Business Insurance
  • Travel Insurance
  • Specialized Insurance
  • Insurance Tips & Guides
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Insure GenZInsure GenZ Tuesday, February 24
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Subscribe
  • Home
  • Life Insurance
  • Auto Insurance
  • Home Insurance
  • Health Insurance
  • Business Insurance
  • Travel Insurance
  • Specialized Insurance
  • Insurance Tips & Guides
Insure GenZInsure GenZ
Home»Life Insurance»Judge Upholds $243M Verdict Against Tesla Over Fatal Autopilot Crash
Life Insurance

Judge Upholds $243M Verdict Against Tesla Over Fatal Autopilot Crash

AwaisBy AwaisFebruary 23, 2026No Comments2 Mins Read0 Views
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn Tumblr Copy Link Email
Follow Us
Google News Flipboard
Judge Upholds $243M Verdict Against Tesla Over Fatal Autopilot Crash
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Copy Link

A federal judge rejected Tesla’s request to overturn a $243 million jury verdict over the 2019 crash of an Autopilot-equipped Model S, which killed a 22-year-old woman and severely injured her boyfriend.

In a decision made public on Friday, U.S. District Judge Beth Bloom in Miami said the evidence at trial “more than supports” the August 2025 verdict, and Tesla raised no new arguments to set the verdict aside.

Tesla, led by Elon Musk, is expected to appeal. Neither Tesla nor its lawyers immediately responded to requests for comment.

The case arose from an April 25, 2019, incident in Key Largo, Florida, in which George McGee drove his 2019 Model S through an intersection at about 62 mph (100 kph) while he bent to look for his phone, which he had dropped.

McGee crashed into Naibel Benavides Leon and Dillon Angulo’s SUV, which was parked on a shoulder and which they stood beside. Benavides was killed.

Jurors found Tesla 33% responsible for the crash. They awarded compensatory damages of $19.5 million to Benavides’ estate and $23.1 million to Angulo, plus $200 million of punitive damages to be split between them. McGee previously settled with the plaintiffs.

The verdict was the first from a federal jury concerning a fatal accident involving Autopilot.

Tesla Blamed Driver for Striking Victims

In seeking a reversal, Tesla said McGee deserved sole blame, his Model S wasn’t defective, and the verdict defied common sense.

Tesla said automakers “do not insure the world against harms caused by reckless drivers,” and punitive damages should be zero because it did not exhibit “reckless disregard for human life” under Florida law.

Adam Boumel, a lawyer for Benavides’ estate and Angulo, said his clients were pleased with the decision.

“From day one, Tesla has refused to accept responsibility,” Boumel said in an email. “Autopilot was defective, and Tesla put it on American roads before it was ready and before it was safe.”

Tesla has faced many lawsuits over its vehicles’ self-driving capabilities, but they had been resolved or dismissed without going to trial.

Musk, the world’s richest person, has long touted Tesla as a leader in autonomous driving for private vehicles and robotaxis.

Topics
Legislation
Tesla

Interested in Autonomous Vehicles?

Get automatic alerts for this topic.

243M Autopilot Crash Fatal Judge Tesla upholds verdict
Follow on Google News Follow on Flipboard
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Telegram Email Copy Link
Awais
  • Website

Related Posts

Judge in Michigan Charged With DUI After Car Strikes Signs

February 23, 2026

New York City Isolated by Snowstorm as Thousands of Flights Canceled

February 23, 2026

Sompo Receives Regulatory Approvals to Acquire Aspen Insurance in $3.5B Deal

February 23, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Our Latest Blogs

California CT claims drive Employers Holdings to massive net income collapse

February 24, 2026

Institutional ILS demand surges, investment manager selection remains key: bfinance

February 23, 2026

Marsh taps data center legal veteran to lead contract strategy amid $7tn build-out

February 23, 2026

Quiz – How Well Do You Understand Your Health Insurance?

February 23, 2026
Recent Posts
  • California CT claims drive Employers Holdings to massive net income collapse
  • Institutional ILS demand surges, investment manager selection remains key: bfinance
  • Marsh taps data center legal veteran to lead contract strategy amid $7tn build-out
  • Quiz – How Well Do You Understand Your Health Insurance?
  • McLarens taps Crisis24 veteran to lead US malicious assailant practice

Subscribe to Updates

Insure Genz is a modern insurance blog built for the next generation. Subscribe it for more updates.

Insure Genz is a modern insurance blog built for the next generation. We break down complex topics across categories like Auto, Health, Business, Life, and Travel Insurance — making them simple, useful, and easy to understand. Whether you're just getting started or looking for expert tips and guides, we've got you covered with clear, reliable content.

Our Picks

California CT claims drive Employers Holdings to massive net income collapse

February 24, 2026

Institutional ILS demand surges, investment manager selection remains key: bfinance

February 23, 2026

Marsh taps data center legal veteran to lead contract strategy amid $7tn build-out

February 23, 2026

Quiz – How Well Do You Understand Your Health Insurance?

February 23, 2026
Most Popular

California CT claims drive Employers Holdings to massive net income collapse

February 24, 2026

Institutional ILS demand surges, investment manager selection remains key: bfinance

February 23, 2026

Marsh taps data center legal veteran to lead contract strategy amid $7tn build-out

February 23, 2026

Quiz – How Well Do You Understand Your Health Insurance?

February 23, 2026
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
© 2026 Insure GenZ. Designed by Insure GenZ.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.