The mid-year 2026 property catastrophe reinsurance renewals are seeing pricing outcomes skewing towards the worst end of a -15% to-20%+ range, while catastrophe bonds have become more of a competitive threat to reinsurers now given longer-durations of cover and better rates, according to Aditya Dutt, President of Aeolus Capital Management.
At the mid-year renewals, property catastrophe reinsurance pricing is seen to be down 15% to 20% compared to the prior year, a faster decline than the 10% to 15% declines seen at January 1st.
But Dutt told the analysts that outcomes are skewing more towards the worst end of that range, with pricing pressure most intense in US nationwide accounts and the Florida market cited as the most competitive.
Competitive pressures in the retrocession market are said to be slightly lower, but pricing is still moving down.
Incremental reinsurance demand of around $10 billion to $15 billion is not seen as enough to offset pricing pressures, given how well or over capitalised the reinsurance industry is today.
Dutt also noted during his discussion with the Jefferies analysts that cedants are tending to retain the savings made on reinsurance, rather than buying much more than plan.
Encouragingly though, Dutt continues to see terms and conditions as largely holding.
Attachment points are seen as likely the most important here, but Dutt said these are broadly stable, according to the Jefferies analyst report.
There has been some movement in scope of coverage, but nothing deemed overly material at this stage.
On sector capital, reinsurance is seen as over-capitalised and Dutt noted that traditional capital is accelerating faster than ILS, except for in catastrophe bonds.
Dutt also noted that ILS remains interesting to institutional investors, as it proves out its lack of correlation during the volatile geopolitical and market environments we are seeing.
The catastrophe bond market is seeing the highest growth and is the most competitive piece of the market.
Dutt told the analysts that cat bonds are competing more aggressively against traditional reinsurance, and notably said that cat bonds are also more of a competitive threat than perhaps ever before, given the longer-duration coverage available and the lower rates of protection available.
Finally, Dutt highlighted that historically it has taken events that remove around 20% of market capital for their to be meaningful pricing changes, which implies a loss of around $135 billion may be required to turn the reinsurance market hard again.
Dutt said that, absent a large loss, prices may deteriorate further moving into the January 2027 reinsurance renewals.
