Close Menu
  • Home
  • Life Insurance
  • Auto Insurance
  • Home Insurance
  • Health Insurance
  • Business Insurance
  • Travel Insurance
  • Specialized Insurance
  • Insurance Tips & Guides
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Insure GenZInsure GenZ Tuesday, June 2
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Subscribe
  • Home
  • Life Insurance
  • Auto Insurance
  • Home Insurance
  • Health Insurance
  • Business Insurance
  • Travel Insurance
  • Specialized Insurance
  • Insurance Tips & Guides
Insure GenZInsure GenZ
Home»Auto Insurance»Amazon’s Ring Sued Over Facial Recognition Feature
Auto Insurance

Amazon’s Ring Sued Over Facial Recognition Feature

AwaisBy AwaisJune 2, 2026No Comments2 Mins Read1 Views
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn Tumblr Copy Link Email
Follow Us
Google News Flipboard
Amazon’s Ring Sued Over Facial Recognition Feature
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Copy Link

Amazon was sued on Monday by a Virginia resident over what he said were privacy violations after the company’s Ring doorbell cameras at friends and family members’ homes collected and stored images of his face using facial recognition software.

The plaintiff, Charles Sigwalt, who is seeking class-action status, sued Amazon in federal court in Seattle alleging a feature known as “Familiar Faces” retains images of passersby without their consent. He is seeking at least $5 million in damages for the class.

Familiar Faces, which is optional, uses artificial intelligence to identify and remember people so that when they return to a home or a business, notifications can include specific names.

Those affected “did not consent to have their privacy rights violated at the entrance way,” according to the suit. “Millions of other Americans passed by a Ring security camera and unknowingly had their facial recognition information collected.”

Amazon declined to comment.

The suit, which seeks unspecified damages for those impacted, is just the latest in a string of controversies around Amazon’s Ring, the unit that makes the eponymous smart doorbells and security systems.

Ring, which Amazon bought in 2018 for $1 billion, in February faced a backlash over a service that it advertised during the Super Bowl that it said helps people find lost dogs by activating its neighborhood network of cameras. Users and privacy advocates were concerned the cameras could be deployed to surveil whole neighborhoods or areas.

Following the criticism, Ring in February ended an unrelated partnership with Flock Safety, which deploys license plate readers and cameras for law enforcement use.

In 2023, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission reached a $5.8 million settlement with Ring over privacy allegations that it said included a former employee spying on female customers in their home bedrooms and bathrooms.

The FTC said Ring employees had unrestricted access to customers’ sensitive video data, allowing them and contractors to view and download it. Amazon denied any wrongdoing as part of the settlement.

U.S. Democratic Senator Ed Markey alleged in 2022 that Ring violated people’s privacy through its partnerships with law enforcement, allowing them access to some user footage without proper consent.

In the suit filed on Monday, Sigwalt said Amazon’s “conduct here represents a profound privacy failure for millions of people who are now being tracked by Amazon.”

Topics
Lawsuits
Amazon

Interested in Lawsuits?

Get automatic alerts for this topic.

Amazons Facial feature recognition Ring sued
Follow on Google News Follow on Flipboard
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Telegram Email Copy Link
Awais
  • Website

Related Posts

Holmes Murphy Hires Cointment as Sr. Client Executive, Surety

June 2, 2026

Still Too Risky to Move Seafarers out of Gulf, U.N. Agency Boss Says

June 2, 2026

Report Calls for Transparency, Modernization of Washington Fire Scoring Bureau

June 2, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Our Latest Blogs

GE Vernova Must Continue Vineyard Wind Work While Payment Issues Play Out

June 2, 2026

Social Media Companies to Pay $27M to Settle Kentucky School District’s Lawsuit

June 2, 2026

Florida Sues OpenAI, Sam Altman Over Chatbot Safety Concerns

June 2, 2026

FTC requires Ascension divestitures in $3.9B AmSurg deal

June 2, 2026
Recent Posts
  • GE Vernova Must Continue Vineyard Wind Work While Payment Issues Play Out
  • Social Media Companies to Pay $27M to Settle Kentucky School District’s Lawsuit
  • Florida Sues OpenAI, Sam Altman Over Chatbot Safety Concerns
  • FTC requires Ascension divestitures in $3.9B AmSurg deal
  • Market conditions suggest alternative capital will increase further: Guy Carpenter’s Rousseau

Subscribe to Updates

Insure Genz is a modern insurance blog built for the next generation. Subscribe it for more updates.

Insure Genz is a modern insurance blog built for the next generation. We break down complex topics across categories like Auto, Health, Business, Life, and Travel Insurance — making them simple, useful, and easy to understand. Whether you're just getting started or looking for expert tips and guides, we've got you covered with clear, reliable content.

Our Picks

GE Vernova Must Continue Vineyard Wind Work While Payment Issues Play Out

June 2, 2026

Social Media Companies to Pay $27M to Settle Kentucky School District’s Lawsuit

June 2, 2026

Florida Sues OpenAI, Sam Altman Over Chatbot Safety Concerns

June 2, 2026

FTC requires Ascension divestitures in $3.9B AmSurg deal

June 2, 2026
Most Popular

GE Vernova Must Continue Vineyard Wind Work While Payment Issues Play Out

June 2, 2026

Social Media Companies to Pay $27M to Settle Kentucky School District’s Lawsuit

June 2, 2026

Florida Sues OpenAI, Sam Altman Over Chatbot Safety Concerns

June 2, 2026

FTC requires Ascension divestitures in $3.9B AmSurg deal

June 2, 2026
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
© 2026 Insure GenZ. Designed by Insure GenZ.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.