Close Menu
  • Home
  • Life Insurance
  • Auto Insurance
  • Home Insurance
  • Health Insurance
  • Business Insurance
  • Travel Insurance
  • Specialized Insurance
  • Insurance Tips & Guides
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Insure GenZInsure GenZ Saturday, June 13
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Subscribe
  • Home
  • Life Insurance
  • Auto Insurance
  • Home Insurance
  • Health Insurance
  • Business Insurance
  • Travel Insurance
  • Specialized Insurance
  • Insurance Tips & Guides
Insure GenZInsure GenZ
Home»Life Insurance»California Suing Former 23andMe Firm for 2023 Data Breach
Life Insurance

California Suing Former 23andMe Firm for 2023 Data Breach

AwaisBy AwaisJune 2, 2026No Comments2 Mins Read0 Views
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn Tumblr Copy Link Email
Follow Us
Google News Flipboard
A Backlash Against Data Centers Is Spilling Into French Municipal Election Races
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Copy Link

California Attorney General Rob Bonta filed a lawsuit against the DNA company formerly known as 23andMe for failing to protect consumer data.

Bonta sued Chrome Holding Co., formerly known as 23andMe, for failing to protect its customers’ personal information and genetic data related to health, genetic predispositions and risk factors, biological relatives, ancestry and ethnicity.

The suit stems from a 2023 data breach that affected nearly 7 million 23andMe users across the U.S., including 855,541 California residents.

Related: California Fails to Stop 23andMe Founder From Re-Acquiring Company

Bonta’s office says the company failed to take reasonable measures to protect its customers’ data, ignored known vulnerabilities in its systems and failed to properly investigate or respond to warnings that its systems had been compromised. The company also misled its customers and the public regarding aspects of the 2023 data breach.

In the complaint, filed last week in San Francisco Superior Court, Bonta alleges 23andMe’s failures to implement and maintain reasonable security procedures and its misleading statements regarding its security and the data breach were unlawful.

Related: Dozens of States Sue 23andMe to Block Sale of Personal Genetic Data

A 2023 investigation by the California Department of Justice showed 23andMe’s data security practices fell below industry standards. According to the investigation, the threat actor was able to operate undetected within 23andMe’s systems for more than five months. The company began investigating after the threat actor offered the stolen user data for sale on the dark web and reached out to 23andMe to demand a ransom.

The laws these failures violated include the California’s Genetic Information Privacy Act, Reasonable Data Security Law, False Advertising Law, Unfair Competition Law, and the California Consumer Privacy Act, according to the California DOJ.

Topics
Lawsuits
California
Cyber

Was this article valuable?


Here are more articles you may enjoy.

Interested in Cyber?

Get automatic alerts for this topic.

23andMe Breach California Data Firm Suing
Follow on Google News Follow on Flipboard
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Telegram Email Copy Link
Awais
  • Website

Related Posts

Claimants of 23andMe Data Breach to Get $46.75M in Settlement Deal

June 12, 2026

Two California Insurance Commissioner Candidates Are Left, and Reform Is Coming

June 12, 2026

California Health Worker Union, Hospital Association Tout Dueling Ballot Initiatives

June 12, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Our Latest Blogs

Negligent hiring claim triggers auto coverage, escapes West Virginia exclusion

June 13, 2026

State Farm loses appeal as court reinstates $203,806 crash verdict

June 13, 2026

CMS creates office dedicated to health technology

June 13, 2026

Mercury raises Cal fire reinsurance target to $125m-$175m with second Luca Re cat bond

June 13, 2026
Recent Posts
  • Negligent hiring claim triggers auto coverage, escapes West Virginia exclusion
  • State Farm loses appeal as court reinstates $203,806 crash verdict
  • CMS creates office dedicated to health technology
  • Mercury raises Cal fire reinsurance target to $125m-$175m with second Luca Re cat bond
  • Auto-Owners loses appeal over disputed bill, owes $315,000 no-fault judgment

Subscribe to Updates

Insure Genz is a modern insurance blog built for the next generation. Subscribe it for more updates.

Insure Genz is a modern insurance blog built for the next generation. We break down complex topics across categories like Auto, Health, Business, Life, and Travel Insurance — making them simple, useful, and easy to understand. Whether you're just getting started or looking for expert tips and guides, we've got you covered with clear, reliable content.

Our Picks

Negligent hiring claim triggers auto coverage, escapes West Virginia exclusion

June 13, 2026

State Farm loses appeal as court reinstates $203,806 crash verdict

June 13, 2026

CMS creates office dedicated to health technology

June 13, 2026

Mercury raises Cal fire reinsurance target to $125m-$175m with second Luca Re cat bond

June 13, 2026
Most Popular

Negligent hiring claim triggers auto coverage, escapes West Virginia exclusion

June 13, 2026

State Farm loses appeal as court reinstates $203,806 crash verdict

June 13, 2026

CMS creates office dedicated to health technology

June 13, 2026

Mercury raises Cal fire reinsurance target to $125m-$175m with second Luca Re cat bond

June 13, 2026
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
© 2026 Insure GenZ. Designed by Insure GenZ.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.