Gencon sees it differently. The captive insurer argues that its general liability policies, starting from November 2001, narrowed the sexual misconduct exclusion to cover only “the actual or threatened sexual abuse or sexual molestation.” That language, Gencon contends, preserved coverage for negligence and derivative liability claims, which formed the basis of the students’ cases against Church entities.
Captive insurer sues AIG and Swiss Re units over $55 million bill
