Close Menu
  • Home
  • Life Insurance
  • Auto Insurance
  • Home Insurance
  • Health Insurance
  • Business Insurance
  • Travel Insurance
  • Specialized Insurance
  • Insurance Tips & Guides
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Insure GenZInsure GenZ Thursday, April 23
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Subscribe
  • Home
  • Life Insurance
  • Auto Insurance
  • Home Insurance
  • Health Insurance
  • Business Insurance
  • Travel Insurance
  • Specialized Insurance
  • Insurance Tips & Guides
Insure GenZInsure GenZ
Home»Auto Insurance»Supreme Court Voices Little Interest in More Curbs on SEC
Auto Insurance

Supreme Court Voices Little Interest in More Curbs on SEC

AwaisBy AwaisApril 21, 2026No Comments4 Mins Read0 Views
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn Tumblr Copy Link Email
Follow Us
Google News Flipboard
Supreme Court Voices Little Interest in More Curbs on SEC
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Copy Link

The US Supreme Court expressed little enthusiasm for curbing one of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s most important enforcement tools, as the justices weighed restricting the financial watchdog’s power to collect ill-gotten gains.

Hearing arguments in Washington Monday, the court considered whether the SEC must show identifiable investor harm in order to win “disgorgement,” a legal remedy designed to recoup illicit profits and return them to victims.

The high court limited the SEC’S disgorgement power in 2020, and critics of the commission are looking to build on that ruling.

But even Justice Clarence Thomas, who had voted to bar the use of disgorgement altogether in 2020, indicated he isn’t a sure bet this time around. Thomas told a lawyer arguing for new restrictions that “the world has changed in this area” because of a statute Congress passed in the aftermath of the 2020 ruling.

Although Monday’s session wasn’t definitive, the court spent less than a half hour questioning the Justice Department lawyer representing the SEC in its bid for broad disgorgement powers. That’s potentially a positive sign for the government from a court that often spends more than an hour peppering government lawyers with skeptical queries.

The court’s ruling will shape a panoply of SEC cases in which victims aren’t easy to pinpoint, from low-profile record-keeping violations to major insider trading allegations. The SEC used disgorgement to secure orders for more than $6 billion in fiscal 2024 and almost $11 billion last year.

The clash could also affect the SEC’s lawsuit against Elon Musk for allegedly flouting a deadline to disclose his growing stake in Twitter, now known as X, and in the process saving himself more than $150 million. In a suit filed days before President Donald Trump took office, the SEC is seeking disgorgement as well as civil penalties. Musk and the SEC told a judge earlier this month they are headed toward a trial.

Civil Penalties

Disgorgement is distinct from civil penalties, which the agency can use as punishment if it can meet the legal requirements. The Supreme Court said in 2024 that defendants have a constitutional right to a jury trial in federal court when the commission asks for civil penalties.

The SEC says it should be able to win disgorgement without having to show identifiable investor harm, known to lawyers as “pecuniary” harm. Disgorgement “is designed to deprive the defendant of ill-gotten gains and is measured by profits,” Justice Department lawyer Malcolm Stewart.

Daniel Geyser, the lawyer challenging the SEC, said that approach would eliminate the distinction between disgorgement and civil penalties.

“It would permit an unbounded form of disgorgement rejected by this court and unmoored from its traditional roots,” said Geyser, who represents a man accused by the SEC of taking part in fraudulent schemes tied to at least 20 penny stock companies.

Geyser drew pushback from the court’s liberal wing, including Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. “If we’re just disgorging his ill-gotten gains, I guess I’m not sure I understand why that’s a punishment,” she said.

Conservative Justice Neil Gorsuch pointed to SEC statistics indicating that only a small fraction of the money won in disgorgement orders ever gets returned to victims. Gorsuch suggested SEC defendants might at least be entitled to a jury trial under the Constitution’s 7th Amendment if the commission is keeping disgorgement awards.

“I don’t see how it would not trigger the Seventh Amendment if the government just decided to keep all the money,” Gorsuch said.

The case involves Ongkaruck Sripetch, who allegedly joined with associates to promote shares and then dump them before the price cratered. The schemes generated $6.6 million in illicit profits, according to the SEC.

Sripetch has separately pleaded guilty to one count of selling unregistered securities and was sentenced to 21 months in prison.

The case is Sripetch v. Securities and Exchange Commission, 25-466.

Photo: Photographer: Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg

The most important insurance news,in your inbox every business day.

Get the insurance industry’s trusted newsletter

Court Curbs interest SEC Supreme Voices
Follow on Google News Follow on Flipboard
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Telegram Email Copy Link
Awais
  • Website

Related Posts

Man Pleads Guilty in Crash That Killed Sheriff’s Recruit, Injuring 25 Others in California

April 23, 2026

Iran Seizes Ships in Strait of Hormuz After Trump Halts Attacks

April 22, 2026

Court affirms employer workers’ comp lien on full asbestos tort settlement

April 22, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Our Latest Blogs

Four in Five CROs Rank Cyber Among Top Risks

April 23, 2026

Insurance moves: Patriot, CRC, Alliant, Pekin, Oscar Health and Clyde & Co

April 23, 2026

California Wildfire Risk Bills Cruising Through Legislature

April 23, 2026

Man Pleads Guilty in Crash That Killed Sheriff’s Recruit, Injuring 25 Others in California

April 23, 2026
Recent Posts
  • Four in Five CROs Rank Cyber Among Top Risks
  • Insurance moves: Patriot, CRC, Alliant, Pekin, Oscar Health and Clyde & Co
  • California Wildfire Risk Bills Cruising Through Legislature
  • Man Pleads Guilty in Crash That Killed Sheriff’s Recruit, Injuring 25 Others in California
  • Roblox Settles With Three States For $35.8 Million Over Child Safety

Subscribe to Updates

Insure Genz is a modern insurance blog built for the next generation. Subscribe it for more updates.

Insure Genz is a modern insurance blog built for the next generation. We break down complex topics across categories like Auto, Health, Business, Life, and Travel Insurance — making them simple, useful, and easy to understand. Whether you're just getting started or looking for expert tips and guides, we've got you covered with clear, reliable content.

Our Picks

Four in Five CROs Rank Cyber Among Top Risks

April 23, 2026

Insurance moves: Patriot, CRC, Alliant, Pekin, Oscar Health and Clyde & Co

April 23, 2026

California Wildfire Risk Bills Cruising Through Legislature

April 23, 2026

Man Pleads Guilty in Crash That Killed Sheriff’s Recruit, Injuring 25 Others in California

April 23, 2026
Most Popular

Four in Five CROs Rank Cyber Among Top Risks

April 23, 2026

Insurance moves: Patriot, CRC, Alliant, Pekin, Oscar Health and Clyde & Co

April 23, 2026

California Wildfire Risk Bills Cruising Through Legislature

April 23, 2026

Man Pleads Guilty in Crash That Killed Sheriff’s Recruit, Injuring 25 Others in California

April 23, 2026
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
© 2026 Insure GenZ. Designed by Insure GenZ.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.